PDF

Mike Younger and Molly Warrington
April 22, 2005

This report is one outcome of the Raising Boys‟ Achievement Project, which operated in English primary and secondary schools between 2000 and 2004. The report highlights the challenges and strategies employed by these schools, which will have implications for the debate concerning the gap in achievement by gender. Schools that had strategies implemented, which improved the academic performance of boys without negatively affecting girls‟ performances, were identified and called originators. Based on research conducted with originators, strategies can be placed in four categories:


o Pedagogic: classroom based approaches centred on teaching and learning
o Individual: focus on target- setting and mentoring
o Organizational: ways of organizing learning at the whole school level
o Socio-cultural: approaches that attempt to create an environment for learning that facilitate the congruence between students‟ beliefs and attitudes, and the goals of the school

During the intervention phase, schools and originators formed triads. The triads implemented strategies of originators and the outcome was monitored. The main pedagogic approach focused on literacy. Strategies include the development of a „reading buddy‟ scheme, and using drama to teach literacy. There was a focus on encouraging boys to become successful and satisfied readers by establishing a context in which boys wanted to read. This involved:


1)  having a wide range of texts available, creating a space for talk and reflection about reading, and sharing ideas about the text and what was enjoyable in it
2)  providing opportunities to choose interesting reading matter, and to discuss reading in a meaningful way

Research conducted during the project did not support the belief that the dominant learning styles of boys differ from those of girls nor the case of boy-friendly pedagogies, either in the context of mixed-sex or single-sex teaching. However, the authors noted a set of pre-conditions that seem essential in any attempt to implement single-sex classes for particular subjects:

 

  • Teachers must use a proactive and assertive approach, which avoids the negative or confrontational, but conveys high expectations and a sense of challenge, and uses praise regularly and consistently.
  • There must be the promotion of a team ethic, to forge an identity for the class of which the students can feel part, with humour and informality, and identification with students‟ interests and enthusiasms.


It is noted that “One of the essential conclusions we have reached through the RBA Project, is that „under-achieving‟ boys and girls are not likely to engage with learning if schools simply concentrate on adopting narrowly focused and quick-fix solutions in isolation from the ethos of the whole school.” Instead, the authors conclude that the characteristics of quality teaching are just as suitable and effective for both boys and girls.

PDF
0
Jamaica Ministry of Education
March 1, 2011

The Ministry of Education in its policy thrust to raise the literacy level of the school-aged population, implemented in 2009, the Competence-Based Transition Policy to regulate the flow of children from the primary to the secondary level. This new direction will link eligibility for Grade Six Achievement Test (GSAT) to certification in literacy based on the externally administered Grade 4 Literacy Test.

PDF
0
Mona Mourshed
December 1, 2010

In 2010, McKinsey and Comapny published a report that focused on mapping the journeys of 20 of the best improving education systems world wide. They were selected because they "achieved significant, sustained and widespread gains in student outcomes from 1980 onwards". Quantitative data were reviewed from these systems and over 200 system leaders were interviewed, which resulted in the identification of 575 reform interventions. The report noted that "while the context does influence the emphasis and combination of interventions the system chooses from within this cluster, the intervention pattern is strikingly consistent for systems pursuing similar outcomes" (Mourshed, Chijioke and Barber, 2010, p. 24).

PDF
0

Related Query

The Consolidated reply was compiled from a community discussion around a user query. To view the original dialogue, click to the right.
PDF
Alesia
Feb 17, 2011

Mrs. Jennifer Silvera, Dr. Maureen Byfield and Mrs. Novelette McLean Francis, Literacy Advisors to USAID/ Jamaica Basic Education Project, were the moderators for the first Jamaica Partners for Educational Progress E dicussion, EduExchange, in 2011. The E discussion was held between February 1 and 3 and the discussants were called upon to identify factors that impact students' performance on the Grade Four Literacy Test (GFLT), and useful strategies that could be used to improve the performance of the one third of students who are currently failing the examination.

Elaine Foster Allen
National Education Inspectorate
November 1, 2010

The First Chief Inspector's Report on Education in Jamaica

In 2010, the National Education Inspectorate (NEI) completed its first round of inspections on 30 public schools at the primary and secondary level. By highlighting the strengths and weakness of the approaches and practices of these schools, valuable feedback and lessons are encapsulated in this comprehensive report.

The report focused on 8 key indicators of school effectiveness:

  1. Leadership and management
  2. Teaching and learning
  3. Students' performance in regional and national examinations
  4. Students' progress in relation to their starting point
  5. Personal and social development
  6. Human and material resources
  7. Safety, security and well-being

The Evidence

The NEI observed over 1100 lessons across thirty schools (23 at the primary level and 7 secondary), 60 percent were Mathematics and English Language classes and the remaining were lessons from across the other areas of the curriculum. The Inspectors also conducted 321 interviews with staff: principals, vice principals, guidance counselors and senior teachers as well as 123 on-site interviews with students during the course of these inspections.

In addition, 6275 students responded to the Inspectorates student satisfaction survey, two thousand seven-hundred and eighty-four (2,784) parents gave their perception of their children's school and 499 teachers expressed their views about the teaching and learning culture and leadership in their institution.

Key Findings

It is at the Primary level that leadership is weakest. Of the twenty-three schools inspected, thirteen were rated as unsatisfactory on all components and eight were considered as satisfactory. Only in one Primary school was the leadership and management assessed as good. The report noted that leadership was weakest in those schools where the principal failed to demonstrate focused strategic and instructional leadership and did not hold staff accountable. In one such school the inspectors noted that although the principal had a good relationship with staff, she failed to hold them accountable for improving student performance. The team noted that in these instances:

The leadership lacks the rigor and drive needed to improve teaching and students' achievements and progress. The Principal's and teachers' low expectations of the current and potential performance of individual students and groups of students contribute to the Principal giving limited direction and guidance to teachers with the goal of improving standards. Insufficient energy is placed on instructional leadership which holds teachers accountable for the impact of their teaching on students' learning.

According to the findings, self evaluation, which is critical to improvement planning has not been "fully embraced by the school management culture" and was evidently deficient at both primary and secondary levels. The report noted that "insufficient use of data allows many members of staff to remain unaware of the extent of poor performance" (p. 26). The implementation of effective tracking systems was identified as a problem that plagued many of the schools. Specifically, action goals tended to be too wide, next steps needed to be identified and limited monitoring of the progress toward goals. Conversely, those who were successful in this regard had clear, measureable goals and strong emphasis on teaching and learning.

The report found that at the primary level where teachers function as generalists, their knowledge of subject areas was weakest whereas the reverse was evident in secondary level teachers who function as subject specialists. However, in terms of students' progress in relation to their starting point, the primary level was rated as satisfactory, while performance on this indicator at the secondary level varied depending on school type.

In approximately half of the schools inspected, the curriculum and enhancement programmes supported learning effectively and scored satisfactorily or higher on the safety, security and well-being indicator.

PDF
0
Brian P. Masciadrelli
September 23, 2006

Qualitative interview data are used to explore fathers’(N = 24) perceptions of their own fathers and others as influential parental role models and associations between fathers’ role model perceptions and their involvement with their own children. In fathers’descriptions of their parental role models, three themes emerged: types of models that fathers identified as role models for them as parents, affective evaluations the fathers ascribed to the models, and content that the fathers perceived learning from the models. Highly involved fathers were more likely to cite peer parents than to specifically cite their own fathers as influential role models for them and infrequently cited their spouses as models. Low-involvement fathers more often attributed positive affective evaluations to their models than did highly involved fathers.

PDF
0
Nancy E. Hill and Lorraine C. Taylor
August 1, 2004

Developing collaborations between families and schools to promote academic success has a long-standing basis in research and is the focus of numerous programs and policies. We outline some of the mechanisms through which parental school involvement affects achievement and identify how patterns and amounts of involvement vary across cultural, economic,and community contexts and across developmental levels. We propose next steps for research, focusing on the importance of considering students’ developmental stages, the context in which involvement takes place, and the multiple perspectives through which involvement may be assessed. Finally, we discuss enhancing involvement in diverse situations.

PDF
0

Related Query

The Consolidated reply was compiled from a community discussion around a user query. To view the original dialogue, click to the right.
PDF
Alesia
Dec 14, 2010

The former Chief Education Inspector, Mrs. Elaine Foster Allen, launched an EduExchange e–discussion that examined how schools in challenging contexts could be transformed such that students' performance improved. The aim of the e–discussion was to identify the issues, and suggest strategies for improvement of schools. The summary below reflects the contributions of members, including their suggestions and experiences.

Jamaica Ministry of Education
October 1, 2009

The Sector Plan for Education is influenced by the guiding principles in the Vision 2030 Jamaica -National Development Plan and is based on a shared vision of placing Jamaica prominently on the global map in terms of excellence in education. The Plan will build on work already undertaken by the Task Force on Education Transformation. It recognizes the importance of the integration between education and training.

PDF
0
McKinsey & Company
April 1, 2009

Given our longstanding work on the factors that influence national productivity, and the perceived urgency of
understanding opportunities to improve the US economy's performance, McKinsey & Company believes it is timely to bring together, in one place, a set of analyses that shed light on the price of current educational practices. This study builds on excellent work done by many researchers in the field, while also reflecting the angle of vision and expertise of McKinsey's Social Sector Office, which serves school systems in the United States and around the world.

PDF
0
FILED UNDER: PDF, McKinsey & Company

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - PDF